The Term Limit Catastrophe: Ted Cruz’s Massive “Brain Drain”

(AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana) Original article: https://merionwest.com/2021/02/05/the-term-limit-catastrophe-ted-cruzs-massive-brain-drain/?amp=1 

Senator Ted Cruz, who generally takes the correct stance on issues, is short-sighted and dead wrong when it comes to term limits. On his podcast Verdict, he continues to suggest that we desperately need a constitutional amendment that would prevent United States Senators from serving more than two six-year terms and House members from serving more than three two-year terms.

Consider his words: “Washington insiders get taxpayer money, and members of Congress get re-elected, all while the system fails the American people.” In Senator Cruz’s perfect world, congressional term limits would be the most viable solution for empowering the people. However, given today’s modus operandi on Capitol Hill, pairing term limits with the current administrative (read: deep) state would be a cataclysmic mistake, offering nothing more than a vast power transfer from the elected legislative branch to the unelected executive bureaucracy.

Congress’ abdication of its authority to the unelected bureaucracy, which former President Donald Trump monikered the “Washington swamp,” is nothing new but continues to gets worse. In 1940, the federal government employed fewer than one million workers. Last year, that number surpassed three million. Think about it: For each House member, there are about 7,000 government bureaucrats. For every United States Senator, there are roughly 30,000 bureaucrats.

When one adds in federal government contractors (those who are not technically employees but are still paid by the federal government), that number is closer to seven million. With active-duty military and reserve forces included, the number jumps to more than nine million, which is roughly equivalent to Michigan’s entire population (the 10th largest state in the country).

Who are these unelected bureaucrats? What exactly do they all do? Who gave them such inordinate power?

Both Republican and Democratic members of Congress have abdicated their authority to progressive left-wing bureaucrats, who overwhelmingly supporting Democratic Party candidates for federal office. Let us be clear: Washington, D.C. is a liberal haven that routinely backs Democrats, who, in turn, support D.C. statehoodunfettered and unlimited abortionsjob-killing environmental regulations, endless wars, and other ideological pursuits. In 2016, 95% of political donations from federal government employees ended up in the Clinton campaign’s coffers.

But this issue transcends politics. Congress’ longstanding practice of transferring power to the administrative state is highly problematic because it has made real expertise a rare commodity among elected officials. We need not be surprised that if experts are not needed, it will be grifters, attention-seekers, and the ill-informed who run for higher office.

Over the decades, members of Congress have essentially become figureheads with little to no expertise on critical issues. They have become masters of deferring and delegating. Congress will pass a sweeping, complex law, such as Obamacare, and then leave it up to bureaucrats (and the pharmaceutical lobbyists) to implement it efficiently and effectively. And guess what: If one does not like it, tough luck because it is not possible to vote out a lobbyist or fire a bureaucrat. This is exactly how mandates like Obamacare became such disasters.

Term limits would only further diminish our elected officials’ authority, granting even more power to congressional staff and the administrative state.

There is also a longstanding misconception that congressional turnover is virtually nonexistent, with the same people gaining and holding on to power over the decades. To the contrary, Congress is often replenished with new freshman members, resulting in well over 10% turnover. At the outset of the 115th Congress, more than 60% of our representatives had served four terms or less.

Another one of Washington, D.C.’s worst-kept secrets is that congressional staffers—many of whom are in their 20s and 30s—routinely make high-level decisions that should be reserved for members of Congress. Those staffers often influence, research, craft, and even write the federal laws that transfer power to the executive branch. Since those staffers often lack knowledge or experience—and their bosses do not have it either—that power must be transferred somewhere else: Enter the administrative state.

Why? America’s elected officials can spend three days per week fundraising, two days kissing babies and attending district events, and one day traveling to those events. This leaves only one or two days for legislating, which is the actual job we elected them to perform. It is no wonder that the most important work is often left to unelected and underpaid staff, which is heavily influenced by K Street.

Term limits would only further diminish our elected officials’ authority, granting even more power to congressional staff and the administrative state. Americans would end up with a federal government run primarily by D.C. left-wingers, disincentivizing senators and House members from ever becoming experts on the policy issues relevant to their constituents.

In today’s “swamp,” it can take years—if not decades—to become an expert on navigating the legislative minefield, let alone specific issues. How can elected officials gain expertise if they do not have enough time to gain the requisite experience?

While “draining the swamp” is a worthwhile goal, Senator Cruz’s term-limit proposal would only result in a brain drain from the chambers of Congress. It would benefit career bureaucrats at the expense of elected officials, and those voting for them. The true “experts”—a revolving door of congressional staffers and lobbyists—would become the most valuable political currency in Washington, D.C.—and not the representatives on the ballot.

So what is the solution? Rather than pursuing term limits, the United States must develop a new “spoils system,” with power (e.g. the spoils) reserved for the political victors at the time. In this system, federal workers would be replaced every four to eight years, depending on presidential transitions. From the groundskeeper who cleans the Capitol grounds to those who sweep the halls of Congress and chiefs of staff calling the shots, a new spoils system would actively discourage people from becoming D.C. lifers, while holding bureaucrats accountable.

Losers would not be allowed to retain power if it was not earned via the electoral process. Therefore, it would be easier for Congress to retain its legislative authority and for legislators to be held accountable to the voters for their decisions.

Our current problems can be tracked back to the 1800s. The Pendleton Act of 1883 effectively ended America’s spoils system and introduced today’s career bureaucrat, who waits out presidential administrations and political movements (and may even seek out the destruction of an administration from within) to remain relevant in the nation’s capital. These bureaucrats become long-term fixtures, while elected officials are merely a short-term nuisance in their eyes.

Remember when Senator Chuck Schumer admonished President Trump for criticizing American intelligence agencies? By claiming “they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you,” Senator Schumer essentially admitted that the intelligence apparatus was in place long before President Trump took power and will remain in place, unencumbered, long after he leaves office.

Because the federal government is so large, it takes a substantial amount of institutional knowledge to run it. However, such knowledge should be reserved for long-serving elected officials—not unelected administrators. When Congress did away with the spoils system, elected officials began to outsource expertise to staffers and even vendors, gradually forming the bureaucratic class that we see today. Because their time was limited, our representatives had no reason to understand the ins and outs of D.C. over the long haul.

As Republicans, Senator Cruz and other senators need to limit the scope of government. In the nation’s capital, power will always remain; the only question is who has it. A loss in authority for the elected official is a gain for the millions of federal bureaucrats in our midst.

Instead of limiting terms, Americans would benefit from extending terms for senators and House members, so they can outlast a given election and establish themselves as truly active legislators. In a world of passive legislating, longer terms would force elected officials to become masters of their own craft, gaining the expertise that currently belongs to technocrats.

If our government returned to true federalism, with power decentralized back to the states, perhaps term limits would make more sense. However, that is not our reality. As evidenced by President Joe Biden’s newfound obsession with executive orders, the federal government is only growing larger and larger. States’ rights have been diminished. True federalism is a pipe dream.

With that in mind, Americans need to encourage their representatives to do their jobs. Term limits would defer that responsibility to the wrong people. Senator Cruz and his cohort should abandon their catastrophe of a proposal and return to being the true champions of freedom.

35 Responses

  1. Thank you for this alternative view & potential solution. Unfortunately it seems apparent that politicians serving multiple terms become corrupt to the point that the only representation they provide is for themselves not their constituents. These career politicians are then capable of doing more harm to the American people than an unexperianced bureaucrat. Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Mitch Mcconnell are prime examples of this. These career politicians only strive to protect themselves and behind the scenes there isn’t two parties as they would have us think. They are a United force protecting their established class 1st above all else.

  2. It is perfect time to make a few plans for the future and it is time to be
    happy. I have learn this post and if I could I desire to
    counsel you some interesting things or suggestions.
    Perhaps you could write subsequent articles regarding this article.
    I want to learn more issues about it!

    Look into my blog post CBD oil for dogs

  3. My spouse and I stumbled over here by a different page and thought I might as well check things out.
    I like what I see so i am just following you. Look forward to looking at
    your web page again.

  4. Thank you for some other informative website. Where else may I
    get that kind of info written in such a perfect method?
    I have a challenge that I am just now running on, and I’ve been on the glance out
    for such info.

  5. We’re a gaggle of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community.
    Your website offered us with useful information to work on. You’ve done an impressive task and our
    entire group shall be grateful to you.

  6. First off I want to say terrific blog! I had a quick question that I’d like to ask if you do not mind.
    I was curious to find out how you center yourself
    and clear your mind before writing. I’ve had difficulty clearing my mind in getting my thoughts out.
    I truly do enjoy writing but it just seems like the first 10 to 15 minutes are usually
    wasted simply just trying to figure out how to begin. Any suggestions or tips?
    Thanks!

  7. Wonderful beat ! I wish to apprentice at the same time as you amend your site, how could i subscribe for a blog site? The account aided me a applicable deal. I had been tiny bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided vivid clear idea. Rosalynd Valdemar Faso

  8. Howdy, I believe your web site could possibly be having internet browser compatibility issues. When I look at your website in Safari, it looks fine however when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping issues. I simply wanted to provide you with a quick heads up! Other than that, excellent blog! Oriana Reid Denyse

  9. Hi, I desire to subscribe for this website to take most up-to-date updates, therefore where can i do it please help out.| Tove Waldemar Rainer

  10. An impressive share! I’ve just forwarded this onto a friend who was doing a little research on this.

    And he in fact bought me lunch simply because I stumbled upon it for him…
    lol. So let me reword this…. Thanks for the meal!!
    But yeah, thanx for spending some time to talk about this issue here on your web page.

  11. Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wished to say that I’ve truly
    enjoyed browsing your blog posts. After all I’ll be subscribing
    to your rss feed and I hope you write again very soon!

  12. Generally I do not read post on blogs, however I would like to say that this write-up very
    forced me to try and do so! Your writing taste has been surprised me.
    Thanks, quite great post.

  13. It’s perfect time to make some plans for the future and it is time
    to be happy. I have read this post and if I could I wish to suggest you few interesting things or tips.
    Perhaps you can write next articles referring to this
    article. I want to read even more things about it!

  14. I totally agree that term limits wouldn’t address the bigger problem of the deep state. I don’t agree with Cruz here either.
    Thank you!

  15. Thank you so much for your kind comment and rating. My best advice is to blog out of love for your niche. Blogging is tough and only if you are passionate enough you are going to last. The rest of the story is only hard work and then some more. Hang on! You can do it! Prudy Lance Venola

  16. Skincell Pro has actually been referred by some individuals as
    the ideal skin conditioner. It is a popular product which includes all the needed components to
    make your skin smooth and also even-textured. The product is
    also a scientifically confirmed formula which aids boost your skin structure, even-toned, and even-moisturize.
    I chose to utilize this item for myself to get rid of the mole on my left ear. https://binksites.com/story9267879/does-skincell-pro-really-work

  17. Negatif SEO ile rakiplerinizin sitelerini
    kolaylıkla alt sıralara düşürebilir ve siz rakiplerinizin yerine
    geçebilirsiniz.
    Sizler için sevmediğiniz yada rakip sitelerinize ANTİ SEO çalışması yani Negatif
    SEO çalışması yapabilirim.

    With negative SEO, you can easily lower your competitors’ sites and you can replace your competitors.

    I can do ANTI SEO work, that is, Negative SEO work for you or
    your competitor sites that you do not like.

    Negatif SEO

  18. Negatif SEO ile rakiplerinizin sitelerini kolaylıkla alt sıralara düşürebilir ve siz rakiplerinizin yerine geçebilirsiniz.

    Sizler için sevmediğiniz yada rakip sitelerinize
    ANTİ SEO çalışması yani Negatif SEO çalışması yapabilirim.

    With negative SEO, you can easily lower your competitors’ sites and you can replace your competitors.

    I can do ANTI SEO work, that is, Negative SEO work for you
    or your competitor sites that you do not like.

    Negatif SEO https://antiseo.org/

  19. Negatif SEO ile rakiplerinizin sitelerini
    kolaylıkla alt sıralara düşürebilir ve siz rakiplerinizin yerine geçebilirsiniz.

    Sizler için sevmediğiniz yada rakip sitelerinize ANTİ SEO çalışması yani Negatif SEO çalışması yapabilirim.

    With negative SEO, you can easily lower your competitors’ sites and you can replace
    your competitors.
    I can do ANTI SEO work, that is, Negative SEO work for you or your competitor sites that you do not
    like.

    Negatif SEO

  20. Link exchange is nothing else except it is just placing the other person’s webpage link on your page at appropriate place and other
    person will also do same in support of you.

  21. Thank you for every other informative blog. Where else may I get that type of info written in such an ideal approach? I’ve a venture that I’m simply now working on, and I’ve been on the glance out for such info.

  22. Negatif SEO ile rakiplerinizin sitelerini kolaylıkla alt sıralara düşürebilir ve
    siz rakiplerinizin yerine geçebilirsiniz.
    Sizler için sevmediğiniz yada rakip sitelerinize ANTİ SEO çalışması yani Negatif
    SEO çalışması yapabilirim.

    With negative SEO, you can easily lower your competitors’ sites and you can replace your competitors.

    I can do ANTI SEO work, that is, Negative SEO work
    for you or your competitor sites that you do not like.

    Negatif SEO

  23. It is appropriate time to make some plans for the future
    and it’s time to be happy. I’ve read this post and if I could I want to suggest you some interesting
    things or advice. Maybe you can write next articles referring to this article.

    I wish to read even more things about it!

  24. Good – I should certainly pronounce, impressed with your site. I had no trouble navigating through all the tabs and related information ended up being truly easy to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it in the least. Reasonably unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or anything, site theme . a tones way for your customer to communicate. Nice task.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *